Moving away from the American Idol controversy to music in general, I want to write a short post dealing with a couple questions and clarifications on what I have said in the American Idol posts.
First
In American Idol-Shout to the Lord (pt. 2), made it clear that the only criteria for discerning between appropriate and inappropriate music is its social context. I was wrong. There is one other criteria–content. Content matters. What you sing is as more important than the style of the music.
Second
The question of cross-cultural music appeared as I read up on the issue. Often, musical conservatives are accused of a form of racism. They are accused of looking upon the music of black origin as disreputable and rebellious. This is because some musical conservatives condemn rap, jazz, blues, or large black gospel choirs with a “stomping” beat as sinful.
Some of these styles, such as rap, are rooted in rebellion and are wrong; others are a matter of preference. Preference is important. You would not want to to put a large black gospel choir in front of 90 year old white women; neither would you want to put a bluegrass band in front of a youth group full of black kids. Preference is important, but it is not supreme. It does not dictate morality.
We should seek to praise God in all of our musical choices. We should avoid any music that is rebellious or associated in rebellion. Rather we should seek the things that please God.
Whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.
Third
I made a statement in passing in American Idol-Shout to the Lord.
“[This] type of rock and jazz music is heavily associated with rebellion”
I want to make a clarification on Jazz because of its social context. Jazz used to be heavily associated with rebellion, drugs, and women, even as rock and roll is today. Most forms of Jazz are not considered rebellious in today’s culture. No one that I know of would associate Louis Armstrong with rebellion. However, the style of music he learned and grew up on was played in “dirty” dance halls and brothels all over New Orleans. Yet, no one associates his music with prostitution.
Today, rock and roll has largely replaced Jazz as the music of choice for wicked entertainment. Some of the darker Jazz forms are still associated with drug and drinking dens, but not for the most part. I believe this is where the Christian conscience must come into play. It is still very close to the era where Jazz was and still is in some areas considered rebellious. You must think of whether you view the music as rebellious and whether the people around you view it as rebellious. If either of those groups do view it as rebellious and sinful then you shouldn’t listen to it.
For me, I the music of Louis Armstrong is acceptable.
This post ended up being longer than I had planned, but that is ok. There are still more questions I may address in the future, such as music for the worship of the Church. Think long and hard about it and discuss it.